On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Alexander Ostrow <a...@epcylon.com> wrote:
> Hello, > > I thought it would be cool to have conditional check syntax, which gets > converted to simple check constraint syntax. > > Here’s a gist: > > https://gist.github.com/aj0strow/5a07f2ddcad324c4dac2c4095c821999 > > It’s just sugar, but i think it would make check constraints easier to > read, and easier to write without backwards boolean logic. > For future reference please make every effort to make emails to the list self-contained - which has the added benefit of avoid link expiration in the future. As to the recommendation at hand - I don't see significant value in implementing non-SQL Standard syntax in this area. David J.
