On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Here's a WIP patch to evaluate. Dilip/Ashutosh, could you perhaps run > some benchmarks, to see whether this addresses the performance issues? > > I guess it'd both be interesting to compare master with master + patch, > and this thread's latest patch with the patch additionally applied. > I tested it in Power and seen lot of fluctuations in the reading, From this reading I could not reach to any conclusion. only we can say that with (patch + pinunpin), we can reach more than 600000. I think it needs more number of runs.. After seeing this results I did not run head+pinunpin, Head 64 Client 128 Client ----------------------------------------------------- Run1 434860 356945 Run2 275815 *275815* Run3 437872 366560 Patch 64 Client 128 Client ----------------------------------------------------- Run1 429520 372958 Run2 446249 *167189* Run3 431066 381592 Patch+Pinunpin 64 Client 128 Client ---------------------------------------------------------- Run1 338298 642535 Run2 406240 644187 Run3 595439 *285420 * -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
