On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:00 AM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: > So maybe we should at least start that way. And just document that > clearly, and then use the patch that we have right now? > > Except we add so it still returns the stoppoint() as well (which is > returned from the current pg_stop_backup, but not in the new one). > > We can always extend the function with more columns later if we need - > it's changing the ones we have that's a big problem there :) > > +1 for doing that way for now. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
