Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> On 2016-03-31 06:43:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >>> To which proposal are you referring?
>> 1) in >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160328130904.4mhugvkf4f3wg...@awork2.anarazel.de > OK. So, Noah, my proposed strategy is to wait and see if Andres can > make that work, and if not, then revisit the issue of what to do. I thought that proposal had already crashed and burned, on the grounds that byte-size spinlocks require instructions that many PPC machines don't have. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
