On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: >> >> v40 is yet another rebase. >> > >> > Thanks. Committed after removing an unnecessary parameter from the >> > coerceToXXX() functions. >> > >> > I guess the question here is whether we want the part-c patch, which >> > removes the historical \setrandom syntax. That's technically no >> > longer needed since we now can use random() as a function directly >> > inside \set commands, but we might want it anyway for backward >> > compatibility. >> > >> > Anybody have an opinion on that? >> >> +1 for nuking it. That's not worth the trouble maintaining it. > > If we don't nuke it, it'll never die. > > See also: pg_shadow
Hearing no objections, BOOM. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
