Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Alexander Korotkov > <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And then Alexander posted this version, without any discussion that > >> evidenced that those old objections were overridden. What happened > >> here? Did somebody discuss this in unarchived meetings? If so, it > >> would be good to know about that in this thread. > > > > After that Tom Lane committed very huge patch about rework AM API. One of > > aims of this patch was support for CREATE ACCESS METHOD command. > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=65c5fcd353a859da9e61bfb2b92a99f12937de3b > > I've initially positioned this patch as refactoring for support CREATE > > ACCESS METHOD command. > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/capphfdtlisxmxk2b4tw+4+no_1-t0rao5foyszho6+sn2om...@mail.gmail.com > > During discussing Tom mentioned future CREATE ACCESS METHOD command. > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16164.1439222...@sss.pgh.pa.us > > I don't think Tom would put so much efforts in this direction if he would > > remain opposed to this command. > > Yeah, I rather thought we had consensus on that.
I vaguely remembered so too, but was startled to see that this thread didn't have any evidence of it -- I thought I was misremembering. I'm glad we're all in the same page. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
