Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> I can live with SELECT fx(x). It is little bit dangerous, but this risk can
> be easy detected by plpgsql_check.
Dangerous how?
>> So, I'm -1 on not having any keyword at all. I have no objection
>> to Merlin's proposal though. I agree that PERFORM is starting to
>> look a bit silly, since it doesn't play with WITH for instance.
> Isn't time to fix PERFORM instead?
I do not think it can be fixed without embedding knowledge of PERFORM into
the core parser, which I doubt anybody would consider a good idea.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
