On 20 March 2016 at 03:19, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:32 PM, David Rowley > <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Updated patch is attached. > > I think this looks structurally correct now, and I think it's doing > the right thing as far as parallelism is concerned. I don't see any > obvious problems in the rest of it, either, but I haven't thought > hugely deeply about the way you are doing the costing, nor have I > totally convinced myself that all of the PathTarget and setrefs stuff > is correct. But I think it's probably pretty close. I'll study it > some more next week.
Thank you for the reviews. The only thing I can think to mention which I've not already is that I designed estimate_hashagg_tablesize() to be reusable in various places in planner.c, yet I've only made use of it in create_grouping_paths(). I would imagine that it might be nice to also modify the other places which perform a similar calculation to use that function, but I don't think that needs to be done for this patch... perhaps a follow-on cleanup. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
