On 3/15/16 7:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
In short, I think we should reject this implementation and instead try
to implement the type operators we want in the core grammar's Typename
production, from which plpgsql will pick it up automatically.
+1.
Something else that's been discussed is allowing [] referencing to be
more modular. Offhand I don't see how that would impact this new type
referencing stuff, but maybe someone else sees an issue.
BTW, it might also be useful to allow {} to work as a reference method.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
