On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Given the lack of any other complaints about this, I'm okay with the > approach as presented. (I haven't read the patch in detail, though.)
FWIW, I am still of the opinion that the last patch sent by Peter is in a pretty good shape. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
