"Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> writes:
> What I dislike about this POC is all the disruption in libpq, to be
> honest.
Yeah, I don't much like that either. But I don't think we can avoid
some refactoring there; as designed, conversion of an error message into
user-visible form is too tightly tied to receipt of the message.
> It would be much neater if we could form the verbose message every
> time and let the client decide where to cut it. Maybe a bit "too clever"
> would be to put a \0 char between short message and it's verbose
> continuation. The client could then reach the verbose part like this
> (assuming that libpq did put a verbose part there): msg + strlen(msg) + 1.
Blech :-(
Thinking about it, though, it seems to me that we could get away with
always performing both styles of conversion and sticking both strings
into the PGresult. That would eat a little more space but not much.
Then we just need to add API to let the application get at both forms.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
