On 3/11/16 1:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:36 AM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: >>> It looks like a decision needs to be made here whether to apply this patch, >>> send it back to the author, or reject it so I'm marking it "Ready for >>> Committer". >>> >>> Robert, since you were participating in this conversation can you have a >>> look? > >> Who, me? *looks around* >> >> OK, I had a look. I don't think this is a bug. > > I agree, and Craig's complaint that this change reduces flexibility > for plugins seems to tilt the balance against it. I see that Alex > himself accepted that argument in his last message in the thread > (<cacaco5sm-ty-9yijulbxmclmskytctavqh_1j4tadfjc+1-...@mail.gmail.com>). > > So let's mark it rejected and move on.
+1 and done. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
