On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > ISTM, that there's good enough reasons to go either way; I don't see > > what we're gaining by making these private. That just encourages > > copy-paste coding. > > +1. Frustrating Citus's attempt to open-source their stuff is not in > the project's interest. > > Agreed. And it's not like we're very restrictive with this in a lot of other parts of the code. While we shouldn't go out of our way for forks/extensions, this seems like a very reasonable tradeoff. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
