> > > I think we're converging on a good syntax, but I don't think the > choice of nothingness to represent an open range is a good idea, both > because it will probably create grammar conflicts now or later and > also because it actually is sort of confusing and unintuitive to read > given the rest of our syntax. I suggest using UNBOUNDED instead. > > As much as it reminds me of the window syntax I loathe (ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED ....gah), I'm inclined to agree with Robert here.
It also probably helps for code forensics in the sense that it's easier to text search for a something than a nothing.
