On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouh...@dalibo.com> wrote: > On 04/03/2016 23:34, Michael Paquier wrote: >> New design discussions are a little bit late for 9.6 I am afraid :( >> Perhaps we should consider this patch as returned with feedback for >> the time being? The hook approach is not something I'd wish for if we >> can improve in-core facility that would help user to decide better how >> to tune autovacuum parameters. > > Yes, it's clearly not suited for the final commitfest. I just closed the > patch as "returned with feedback". > > I'll work on the feedbacks I already had to document a wiki page, and > wait for this commitfest to be more or less finished before starting a > new thread on autovacuum instrumentation design.
OK, thanks. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
