On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Sounds like a ppc vs. x86 issue. The regression was on the former, right? Well, Regression what I reported last two time, out of that one was on X86 and other was on PPC. Copied from older Threads -------------------------------------- On PPC >> > > > >> ./pgbench -j$ -c$ -T300 -M prepared -S postgres >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Client Base Patch >> > > > >> 1 17169 16454 >> > > > >> 8 108547 105559 >> > > > >> 32 241619 262818 >> > > > >> 64 206868 233606 >> > > > >> 128 137084 217013 On X86 >> > > > >>Shared Buffer= 8GB >> > > > >>Scale Factor=300 >> > > > >>./pgbench -j$ -c$ -T300 -M prepared -S postgres >> > > > >>client base patch >> > > > >>1 7057 5230 >> > > > >>2 10043 9573 >> > > > >>4 20140 18188 And this latest result (no regression) is on X86 but on my local machine. I did not exactly saw what this new version of patch is doing different, so I will test this version in other machines also and see the results. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
