At 2016-02-29 19:56:07 -0600, jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote: > > I don't see why this would be limited to just functions. […] Am I > missing something?
No, you are not missing anything. The specific problem I was trying to solve involved a function, so I sketched out a solution for functions. Once we have some consensus on whether that's an acceptable approach, I'll extend the patch in whatever way we agree seems appropriate. > Maybe the better way to handle this would be through ALTER EXTENSION? That's what this (second) patch does. > Given the audience for this, I think it'd probably be OK to just > provide a function that does this, instead of DDL. That seems like a promising idea. Can you suggest some possible usage? Thanks. -- Abhijit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
