On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> To be honest, my heart still balances for the Extended() interface. >> This reduces the risk of conflicts with back-patching with 9.5. > > Andres, others, what else can I do to make this thread move on? I can > produce any version of this patch depending on committer's > requirements.
FWIW, I don't expect to have time to review this in the level of detail that would make me confident to commit it any time soon. I've said my piece on what I think the final patch should look like, and I hope that argument was persuasive, but I don't have anything further to add to what I already said. I hope some other committer has some cycles to look at this. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
