On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Client_Count/Patch_Ver 1 64 128 256 >> HEAD(481725c0) 963 28145 28593 26447 >> Patch-1 938 28152 31703 29402 >> >> >> We can see 10~11% performance improvement as observed >> previously. You might see 0.02% performance difference with >> patch as regression, but that is just a run-to-run variation. >> > > Don't the single-client numbers show about a 3% regresssion? Surely not > 0.02%. > Sorry, you are right, it is ~2.66%, but in read-write pgbench tests, I could see such fluctuation. Also patch doesn't change single-client case. However, if you still feel that there could be impact by patch, I can re-run the single client case once again with different combinations like first with HEAD and then patch and vice versa. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
