Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > However, the server log messages stating an IPv6 socket was not made is > > only printed if the binary supports IPv6. The message seems to be a > > compromise between those who wanted a separate IPv6 GUC/flag and those > > who wanted it to silently fail on IPv6. > > I'm not sure. Those who wanted silence don't get any silence and those > who wanted a configurable hard failure get neither the configurability nor > any failure.
That is the compromise. Neither gets what they want, but the final solution is closer to each. This is probably the best we can do. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
