On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 15:50, Larry Rosenman wrote: > --On Monday, January 27, 2003 15:49:06 -0500 Bruce Momjian > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > My idea on this after chat with Dave was to add a GUC option that puts > > the schema.table.column name as the default column label, rather than > > just the column name. (That's so easy, I think even I could do it.) If > > they over-ride it with AS, or if it is an aggregate or FROM subquery, we > > just return the default label as we do now --- we could return no label > > for those cases, but that seems too drastic. I am not overly excited > > about doing this at the protocol level unless there is major need for it. > DONT DEFAULT TO THE NEW ONE WITHOUT NOTICE! > > You will ***BREAK*** people.
Agreed. This is the way we probably want to go -- but we'll need a guc for a release or 2 -- One release with default as current, one with default as new way, 7.6 can remove Guc. -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
