> > > The individual patches have commit messages that describe code changes. > This is registered in the upcoming CF. Feedback and review is greatly > welcomed! > > Thanks, > Amit > > We have a current system that is currently a mix of tables, each of which is range partitioned into approximately 15 partitions (using the pgxn range partitioning extension), and those partitions are themselves date-series partitioned via pg_partman. The largest table ingests about 100M rows per day in a single ETL. I will try this patch out and see how well it compares in handling the workload. Do you have any areas of interest or concern that I should monitor?
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Amit Langote
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Corey Huinker
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Amit Langote
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Tomas Vondra
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Amit Langote
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Corey Huinker
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Amit Langote
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partition... Corey Huinker
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partition... Josh berkus
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative parti... Amit Langote
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative p... Ildar Musin
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative p... Amit Langote
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Amit Langote
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partition... Amit Langote
- Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning Robert Haas