On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote: > The two features are highly intermix, so it can only be dependent patches, > first to add a function infrastructure and probably some support for doubles > altough it would not be used, then to add doubles & their functions. > > A real pain is the documentation, because it means writing a documentation > with only integer functions, then overwriting it with doubles. This is dumb > work, really, for the sake of "a cleaner git history", the beauty of it no > one will ever contemplate...
FWIW, I care a lot about splitting as much as possible patches where it is possible to have a clean history. So I would be fine to do a portion of the legwork and extract from this patch something smaller that adds only functions as a first step, with the minimum set of functions I mentioned upthread. Robert, Alvaro, Fabien, does that sound fine to you? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
