2016-02-12 14:10 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> There will be necessary more changes than this. Orafce has some parts > >> based on lw locks. I am able to compile it without any issue. But the > lock > >> mechanism is broken now - so impact on extensions will be higher. Have > to do > >> some research. > > > > if somebody would to use it for testing > > > > https://github.com/orafce/orafce > > > https://github.com/orafce/orafce/commit/fff56ed7e17ed5d6f8e6b71591ff1a6d6ff12d79 > > > > With last commit I am able to compile orafce without warnings, but > > installcheck is broken. It can be bug in orafce, but this code worked > last 7 > > years. > > That's very strange. It looks to me like you did exactly the right > thing. Can you provide any details on how it fails? >
Looks like some race conditions is there - but I didn't tested it deeper Pavel > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >
