Robert Haas wrote: > Oh: another thing that I would like to do is commit the isolation > tests I wrote for the deadlock detector a while back, which nobody has > reviewed either, though Tom and Alvaro seemed reasonably positive > about the concept. Right now, the deadlock.c part of this patch isn't > tested at all by any of our regression test suites, because NOTHING in > deadlock.c is tested by any of our regression test suites. You can > blow it up with dynamite and the regression tests are perfectly happy, > and that's pretty scary.
FWIW a couple of months back I thought you had already pushed that one and was surprised to find that you hadn't. +1 from me on pushing it. (I don't mean specifically the deadlock tests, but rather the isolationtester changes that allowed you to have multiple blocked backends.) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
