On 2016-02-06 17:43:48 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > >Still the data is here... But well. I won't insist. > > Huh? This thread started by an example how to cause loss of committed > transactions. That fits my definition of "data loss" quite well.
Agreed, that view doesn't seem to make much sense. This clearly is a data loss issue. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
