On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't in the end care very much about how we solve this problem. > But I'm glad you agree that whatever we do to solve the simple problem > should be a logical subset of what the full solution will eventually > look like, not a completely different design. I think that's > important.
Yes, please let's use the custom language, and let's not care of not more than 1 level of nesting so as it is possible to represent pg_stat_replication in a simple way for the user. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
