Etsuro Fujita wrote: > Done. Attached is an updated version of the patch.
Pushed, thanks. I kinda wonder why this struct member has a name that doesn't match the naming convention in the rest of the struct, and also why isn't it documented in the comment above the struct definition. But that's not this patch's fault. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
