On 02/02/2016 02:05 AM, Curtis Ruck wrote:
[snip]
P.S., do you know what sucks, having a highly performant PostGIS
database that works great, and being told to move to Oracle or SQL
Server (because they have auditing). Even though they charge extra
for Geospatial support (seriously?) or when they don't even have
geospatial support (10 years ago). My customer would prefer to
re-engineer software designed around PostgreSQL and pay the overpriced
licenses, than not have auditing. I agree that their cost analysis is
probably way off, even 10 years later, my only solution would be to
move to Oracle, SQL Server, a NoSQL solution, or pay EnterpriseDB for
their 2 year old version that doesn't have all the cool/modern jsonb
support.
Huh? PPAS 9.5.0.5 is already out there since at least last week; Before
that PPAS 9.4.5.y or so was there ...
(Not affiliated with EDB, but precision is important)
I agree that auditing is a big selling point and frequently used... But
it's got to be done "the Postgres way", and that takes time (and usually
provides superior results).
Just my .02€
/ J.L.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
