On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Alexander Korotkov > <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera < alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > > wrote: > >> So far as I can tell, there are three patches in flight here: > >> > >> * replication slot IO lwlocks > >> * ability of extensions to request tranches dynamically > >> * PGPROC > >> > >> The first one hasn't been reviewed at all, but the other two have seen a > >> bit of discussion and evolution. Is anyone doing any more reviewing? > > > > I'd like to add another one: fixed tranche id for each SLRU. > > +1 for this. The patch looks good and I will commit it if nobody objects. >
+1. Patch looks good to me as well, but I have one related question: Is there a reason why we should not assign ReplicationOrigins a fixed tranche id and then we might want to even get away with LWLockRegisterTranche()? With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
