Fabien COELHO wrote: > The answer is essentially yes, the field is needed for the "aggregated" mode > where this specific behavior is used.
OK, thanks, that looks better to me. Can you now appreciate why I asked for split patches? If I had to go over the big patch I probably wouldn't have been able to read through each to make sense of it. I pushed this, along with a few more tweaks, mostly adding comments and moving functions so that related things are together. I hope I didn't break anything. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
