> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: > > Do you think we shall allow to register same extensible node name for > > different node types? Like, "GpuJoin" for any of CustomPath, CustomScan > > and CustomScanState. Or, do we avoid this using different name for each? > > I'd say a different name for each. That's our current convention, and > I don't see much reason to change it. > OK, it is not a serious problem, at least, for my use cases. A convention like "GpuJoinPath", "GpuJoin" and "GpuJoinState" are sufficient. -- NEC Business Creation Division / PG-Strom Project KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
