On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:30:58AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > Any reason why not to adapt the git message conventions from kernel? > > > > https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CommitMessageConventions > > > > I'd expect there are tools already working with that format, making > > the life easier for us. > > Good idea. :-) Updated template: > > -- email subject limit ----------------------------------------- > -- gitweb summary limit -------------------------- > > > Reported-by: > > Bug: > > Patch-by: > > Reviewed-by: > > Backpatch through: > > I had to make up "Patch-by:" as it wasn't listed. > > The original format uses the author for that (author != committer in git), but that changes how we work a bit more. I'd be happy to just clal it "Author" rather than "Patch-by". I also suggest a - in "Backpatch-through:" -- since all the others are intentionally mad ewithout a space, I assume that's for easier parsing. They also had tested-by, it might be an idea to include that as well? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
