On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2016-01-26 2:00 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Vitaly Burovoy pointed on bug in my patch - a pg_size_bytes was VOLATILE >> > function. It is copy/paste bug - I used pg_size_pretty definition, so >> > the >> > question is: why pg_size_pretty is volatile? It should be immutable too. >> >> +1. This function relies only on the input of its argument to generate a >> result. > > > attached patch > > all tests passed
Pushed. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
