On 26-01-2016 09:53, Michael Paquier wrote: > Something like the patch attached would be fine? This wins a backpatch > because the query continuously running eats memory, no? > +1. Although it breaks compatibility, a function that just eats resources is not correct.
-- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
