On 2016-01-20 12:18:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm not really sure why we've allowed CFs to drift on, though. Can't we > just arbitrarily decree them closed on the last day of the month? And > push unfinished work to the next one? Admittedly, this probably doesn't > work for the last CF of a release cycle, but that one's always been a > special case.
I think the problem there is the assumption that each CF entry deserves some amount of feedback. It's not a big problem to close entries of patches that have gotten a fair amount, but it's pretty common to have a set of entries that have barely gotten any review. Usually either because they're perceived as too boring (fair enough), because they're too complex for the majority of non-busy people (uhhh), or because they're seen as claimed. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
