On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> but I don't think that Andreas' patch is necessarily a >> performance patch. There can be value in removing superfluous >> code; doing so sometimes clarifies intent and understanding. > > Well, that's why I said I would be satisfied with a neutral > benchmark result -- when there is a tie, the shorter, simpler code > should generally win. I'm not really sure what there was in what I > said to argue about; since that I've just been trying figure that > out. If we all agree, let's let it drop.
If we don't want to apply this, then I think that a sensible compromise would be to add a code comment that says that we don't believe the LOCK prefix matters. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
