On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> That's because I believe this is quite broken, as already pointed out. > > I think I like your approach better.
That makes things far simpler, then. >> Your premise here is that what Heikki said in passing months ago is >> incontrovertibly the right approach. That's ridiculous. I think Heikki >> and I could work this out quite quickly, if he engaged, but for >> whatever reason he appears unable to. I doubt that Heikki thinks that >> about what he said, so why do you? > > I don't -- I just think you could have sent a patch that addressed all > the other points, leave this one as initially submitted, and note that > the new submission left it unaddressed because you disagreed. I'll try to do that soon. I've got a very busy schedule over the next couple of weeks, though. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
