Andres Freund wrote:
> On December 4, 2015 9:48:55 AM GMT+01:00, Craig Ringer 
> <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >On 3 December 2015 at 22:58, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com>
> >> wrote:
> 
> >http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1+=5Ex8-5NRr3u94=_t2p65v0kcjZ5rXddVmkx=lwa...@mail.gmail.com
> >>
> >Good point. I'm not sure this shouldn't set 'waiting' anyway, though.
> 
> No. Waiting corresponds to pg locks -setting it to true for other things 
> would be even more confusing...

Robert's opinion elsewhere is relevant for this patch, and contradicts
Andres' opinion here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoaj+epoo9qobvfh18f5kjg2taexhq8_-vaywhur-za...@mail.gmail.com

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to