Petr Korobeinikov <pkorobeini...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2016-01-05 21:04 GMT+03:00 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> (I did make some small adjustments --- in this usage, PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP
>> is good enough and likely a bit more efficient than PG_GETARG_TEXT_P.)
> Also I forgot to bump catalog version up. My mishit.
No, submitted patches generally should not touch catversion (though it's
not a bad idea to mention the need for a bump in the submission message).
If you put in a catversion change, it's generally just going to cause
merge failures, since patches seldom get applied instantly.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
