On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 01:16:09AM +0000, Greg Stark wrote: >> >> On 1 Dec 2015 19:48, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> > >> > In passing, avoid possible calculation of log10(0). Probably that's >> > harmless, given the lack of field complaints, but it seems risky: >> > conversion of NaN to an integer isn't well defined. >> >> Am I going to have to fire up the emulator again? > > Greg's lightning talk in Vienna about how he got the emulator working > was priceless. I know he posted the VAX results, but how he got them > was amazing.
+1. The work of a pure hacker. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
