On 2016-01-03 10:03:41 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Indeed it does use shutdown(). If I read the npgsql code that'll even be > > done in the exception handling path. So fixing the 0 byte case might > > already do the trick. > > > > I think this true for a TCP socket, but this code-path is used for UDP > (SOCK_DGRAM) sockets as well and there is a comment below in > that function which seems to be indicating why originally 0 byte case > has not been handled at the place suggested by you (now it seems to > be much less relevant).
I'm not sure what the origin of that comment is, it's been there all the way since a4c40f14. But it doesn't really have much real effect: If WSARecv in the retry loop returns 0 bytes, we'll not retry again as r != SOCKET_ERROR but actually return 0. Note that the whole retry loop in pgwin32_recv(), which kinda mitigates the problem explained above, isn't entered anymore as the FE/BE socket is now always operated in non-blocking mode. I.e. if (pgwin32_noblock) { /* * No data received, and we are in "emulated non-blocking mode", so * return indicating that we'd block if we were to continue. */ errno = EWOULDBLOCK; return -1; } will always be taken. Which exactly explains the problem, together with the edge-triggered behaviour of WaitForMultipleObjects()/WSAEventSelect(). I really think we have a host of buggy code around the event handling - but most of it has been used for a long while. So I think fixing the 0 byte case for 9.5 is good enough. Regards, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers