On 2015-12-30 20:12:07 +0200, Shay Rojansky wrote: > > > > Is this in a backend with ssl? > > > > No.
There goes that theory. Amongst others. The aforementioned problem with waitfor doesn't seem to be actually armed because waitfor is only used if errno == EWOULDBLOCK || errno == EAGAIN. > If you go up one frame, what value does port->sock have? > For some reason VS is telling me "Unable to read memory" on port->sock... I > have no idea why that is... Hm. Is this with a self compiled postgres? If so, is it with assertions enabled? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
