On 2015-12-29 11:07:26 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > In passing, the patch gets rid of a vestigial CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() > call; it was added by e710b65c and IMO should have been removed again > by 6647248e. There's certainly no very good reason to have one right > at that spot anymore.
Why? Doesn't seem like the worst place for an explicit interrupt check? I think we don't really have a problem with too many such checks... We surely could move it, but I don't really see how it's related to the topic at hand nor do I think it's really worth pondering about extensively. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
