Simon Riggs wrote on 29/12/15 05:31:
[...]
Thanks for testing.
Do you have any comments on performance testing?
Not really, because I didn't have an equivalent environment to compare. These
tests took exactly the same time as another one with Postgresql 9.3, with a
major different in the setting of the server:
Postgresql 9.5 RC1
1 GB of RAM
1 vCPU Intel
CentOS 6.5
vs
Postgresql 9.3
8 GB of RAM
4 vCPU LPAR
Redhat 6.5 PowerLinux
So, I can't really compare. So, definitely no performance degradation, and
possible a performance gain. But of course, this could all be the fault of Alfresco.
Discussing with the Alfresco community I found a benchmarking test which I'm not
familiar with. I'll make sure to include that test next time I test a
pre-release version of Postgresql, and I'll make sure to have equivalent
environment to test.
Are there any opportunities to improve Alfresco using the new features in
PostgreSQL 9.5?
I'm not an Alfresco developer, but I'll try to contact the Alfresco engineers to
discuss this.
Thanks
You're welcome and I hope next tests will include some performance measurements
a part from just compliance tests.
Cheers
Boriss
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
