Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On December 25, 2015 7:10:23 PM GMT+01:00, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> 
> wrote:
>> Seems like what you've got here is a kernel bug.

> I wouldn't go as far as calling it a kernel bug. Were still doing 300k tps. 
> And were triggering the performance degradation by adding another socket 
> (IIRC) to the poll(2) call.

Hmm.  And all those FDs point to the same pipe.  I wonder if we're looking
at contention for some pipe-related data structure inside the kernel.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to