On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next >>> CF with the same status. >> >> After a first pass, Numbers are getting down, I am just too tired to >> continue: >> Needs review: 13. >> Waiting on Author: 15. >> Ready for Committer: 5 >> >> Two additional patches have been marked as ready for committer: >> 1) Bug fix for pg_dump --jobs when password is passed a a parameter in >> a connection string: >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/405/ >> 2) Default roles, in Stephen's plate: >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/49/ > > I had a look at all the remaining entries and treated each one of > them, patches marked as ready for committer have been moved to next CF > with the same status. There are currently 3 remaining entries in the > CF app where it would be cool authors and/or reviewers give a status > of the situation. Once this is addressed the CF of 2015-11 will be > closed. > > Note particularly to authors: if your patch has been returned with > feedback, but you are still working on it, please make sure that it is > moved to next CF soon. Or, if your patch has been moved to next CF, > *but* you are not working on it, it would be nice to mark it as > returned with feedback in 2016-01.
And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: Committed: 30. Moved to next CF: 42. Rejected: 9. Returned with Feedback: 22. Total: 103. Regards, -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
