On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: >>> Probably no skips though, because the response time needed is below 5 >>> *seconds*, not ms : 2 tps on 10 connections, 1 transaction every 5 >>> seconds >>> for each connection. >> >> Oops. Right. But why did this test only run 16 transactions in total >> instead of 20? > > Because the schedule is based on a stochastic process, transactions are not > set regularly (that would induce patterns and is not representative of > real-life load) but randomly. > > The long term average is expected to converge to 2 tps, but on a short run > it may differ significantly.
Hmm. Is that documented somewhere? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
