On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2015/12/22 15:24, Michael Paquier wrote: >> As this debate continues, I think that moving this patch to the next >> CF would make the most sense then.. So done this way. > > Perhaps, this ended (?) with the following commit: > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=385f337c9f39b21dca96ca4770552a10a6d5af24
Ah, thanks! What has been committed is actually more or less epq-recheck-v6-efujita.patch posted upthread, I'll mark the patch as committed then. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
