On 2015/12/19 2:05, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> I think the following may be a typo: >> >> * Caller is responsible for ensuring that no other backend can access the >> * storage underlying this tuple, either by holding an exclusive lock on the >> - * buffer containing it (which is what lazy VACUUM does), or by having it by >> + * buffer containing it (which is what lazy VACUUM does), or by having it be >> * in private storage (which is what CLUSTER and friends do). >> >> If so, attached is the patch. > > Committed.
Thanks! Regards, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
